Page 3 of 3   <      

'No Child' Data on Violence Skewed

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) has introduced a bill to soften the term "persistently dangerous schools" and remove the stigma. (By Stephen J. Boitano -- Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

In Maryland, a proposed policy that would have defined persistently dangerous schools based on one year of data was thrown out because it would have identified 36 schools, according to the Department of Education report.

Modzeleski said the Department of Education was unable to force the states to adopt a stricter definition.

"If Congress feels the provisions aren't working well, they have every right to go in and modify them," he said. "We don't have the authority in the law to require that it's one year. We could show that that's the best practice, we could say we'd like them to go there, but we can't mandate them."

The reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act will give Congress a chance to introduce changes to the law or simply abolish it.

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) has introduced a bill that changes "persistently dangerous schools" to "schools which do not have a safe climate for academic achievement," on the grounds that the name alone was causing anxiety over the policy.

"It's not going to be as threatening for schools," she said. "This will remove the stigma associated with high violence."

Chuck Buckler, Maryland's director of student services and alternative programs, said the original term is unpleasant -- akin to telling parents that they were sending their children to a war zone.

"I don't like the title at all," he said. "When this all came about, I said, 'This is something that's going to be a death knell for a school. Everybody will transfer out.' "

He said he was surprised to find that most parents at the six persistently dangerous schools in Baltimore didn't transfer their children to other schools.

The designation, he found, caused communities to rally around their schools and try to make them safer, an effort he said had brought improvements.

Nevertheless, McCarthy hoped that the softer title, which goes along with additional federal aid to unsafe schools, will encourage more states and school systems to take the policy seriously and address problems with violence.

"You can't keep hiding that and you wonder why kids are failing," McCarthy said. "No child should be afraid to go to school."


<          3


More in Education Section

[Michelle Rhee]

Michelle Rhee

Full coverage of D.C. Schools Chancellor.

[Fixing D.C.'s Schools]

D.C. Charters

Learn about every charter school in D.C.

[Class Struggle]

Class Struggle

The latest on education from columnist Jay Mathews.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company