Techniques for Repairing Knee Cartilage
Techniques for Repairing Knee Cartilage
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
In the past 20 years, researchers and surgeons have made advances in repairing and restoring knee cartilage, but no foolproof method exists. Options for cartilage repair include:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Shaving or Debridement: One of the most common treatments for cartilage defects that have not worn to the bone. Using a pencil-thin instrument called an arthroscope inserted into the knee through a small incision, a surgeon shaves and smooths shredded or frayed cartilage. Debridement is often used in combination with the other treatments. Because the technique doesn't fix underlying causes of injury, symptoms may return.
Success rate*: 75 percent
Microfracture or Abrasion: Common for patients with cartilage damage all the way to the bone. Surgeons use arthroscopic tools to scrape the damaged area and create bleeding of the bone. Small holes are then picked into the defect, allowing blood vessels and bone marrow cells to come in contact with the injury. Bone marrow fills the defect, which eventually matures into scar cartilage. Often used as a first-line technique.
Advantages: Surgery is performed arthroscopically. Relatively fast recovery (six to nine months) and cost-effective.
Disadvantages: According to Kai Mithoefer, clinical instructor of orthopedics at Harvard Medical School and author of several landmark studies on cartilage repair, 40 to 70 percent of patients have decreasing knee function after an initial increase, and the surgery has unpredictable results for larger defects.
Success rate: 65 to 80 percent.
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI): Cartilage cells are arthoscopically removed from the injured knee and grown outside the body in a tissue culture. After about four weeks, the cells are implanted into the defect. Over time, the cells grow to fill the defect with a new cartilage surface. Generally recommended for defects over 200 millimeters when there is no cartilage wear around the defect.
Advantages: Many researchers say the technique produces normal hyaline cartilage. It's often used after other techniques have failed and has good durability.
Disadvantages: Requires large incisions, a two-stage technique, has a slow recovery (12 to 18 months) and is expensive.
Success rate: 70 to 90 percent.
Osteochondral Autograft Transfer (OATS): Surgeons take a plug of the patient's cartilage from a part of the knee that does not bear weight during walking and transplant it into the injured part of the knee.


