Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home

For Romney, a Risky Speech

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Robert D. Novak
Thursday, December 6, 2007

Two weeks ago it was settled policy within Mitt Romney's campaign that his speech dealing with his Mormon faith would be delivered much later -- if at all -- and only after primary-election victories. Romney suddenly overruled his advisers to undertake that risky venture today in College Station, Tex., for one reason: Mike Huckabee's ascent in Iowa.

Romney had been told by campaign strategists that flooding television screens with ads financed by his ample funds could win him the critical Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3 in a state where Mormons comprise only 0.5 percent of the population. That was working when the former governor of Massachusetts led the state's polls; then Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor and an ordained Baptist minister, came from nowhere to challenge Romney for first place. Surveys detect substantial anti-Mormon bias.

Iowa is crucial to Romney's delicately balanced strategy to overcome anemic support nationally by winning first in Iowa and then in New Hampshire five days later. The snap decision to deliver the "Mormon speech" left intractable puzzles for the candidate to solve as he personally drafted the speech in private this week. How could he defend his lifelong religion without plunging into the murky waters of theology? How could he plead for tolerance without branding those voting against him as bigots? Incidentally, why is he delivering the speech deep in the heart of Texas, instead of somewhere in Iowa?

Romney's Mormon problem has been obvious for two years, though just two months ago he was still in denial, claiming that only journalists asked him about his religion. One month ago he changed his tune, telling campaign contributors that he liked "the idea" of a speech, but "at some point" in the future because "the political advisers" tell him "it's not a good idea."

These advisers still think it's a bad idea and say that any speech should have been preceded by Romney winning in Iowa, New Hampshire or both. They think Romney is overreacting to the surge for Huckabee, who probably tops out at 25 percent in Iowa. They believe Huckabee's support is pro-evangelical rather than anti-Mormon, boosted by his support of "fair tax" reform to eliminate the federal income tax (disowning his high-tax record in Arkansas).

Also puzzling is why the speech will be given at the George H.W. Bush presidential library at Texas A&M University. Romney aides say it was the idea of Ron Kaufman, a longtime Republican National Committee member from Massachusetts and faithful aide to the elder Bush. Kaufman told me that it was scheduled there because Romney had mentioned a possible speech on religion when he spoke at the Bush library in April. Others in the campaign indicate that the paramount reason is that Romney will be introduced by the former president, in what might be interpreted as a tacit endorsement. Romney's Iowa supporters would have preferred that the candidate speak in their state, addressing an audience of voters.

But what can Romney say? He will no more explore Mormon theology than John F. Kennedy dissected Catholic doctrine in his 1960 Houston speech to Protestant preachers, and he will avoid the slippery slope of discussing whether Mormonism is a Christian faith. Huckabee should not be criticized for dodging that question from George Stephanopoulos on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday. To answer that Romney is a Christian would have earned the former Baptist preacher obloquy from Protestant and Catholic clergy alike.

All that is left for Romney to write is a speech asserting that the Constitution imposes no religious test for the presidency. However, that runs the risk of implicitly indicting as a bigot anyone who votes against Mitt Romney. As one adviser awaited the Texas speech this week without knowing what Romney would say, he hoped that the candidate would come across as a man of faith and integrity.

That adviser is hoping to offset Romney's performance in last week's dismal Republican presidential debate in St. Petersburg, Fla. Romney is no longer called the perfect candidate, hampered solely by religious prejudice. After a half-hour immigrant-bashing duel with Rudy Giuliani, he looked like somebody who would say anything to be nominated. In College Station today, Romney will try to correct that impression, even if he does not win over bigots.

© 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.


© 2007 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity