What McCain Got Wrong
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
WHAT HE GOT WRONG:"Tax cuts, starting with Kennedy, as we all know, increase revenues. So what's the argument for increasing taxes? If you get the opposite effect out of tax cuts?"
-- John McCain, interview with the National Review in March
McCain's claim that tax cuts "increase revenues" and that increasing taxes has the "opposite effect" is contested by his own senior domestic policy adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin. As director of the Congressional Budget Office, Holtz-Eakin estimated in 2005 that a 10 percent individual income tax cut would result in a revenue loss of $1.24 trillion over 10 years.
Under the most optimistic assumptions, increased economic growth generated by the cut would offset this loss by $345 billion, resulting in a net revenue loss of nearly $900 billion. Holtz-Eakin said by e-mail that McCain believes that "cutting middle-class taxes will generate additional growth" but "has never supported the idea that tax cuts pay for themselves." This, however, is precisely the impression created by McCain's National Review interview.
-- Michael Dobbs
For daily truth-squadding, visit washingtonpost.com/factchecker. Read the Candidates Week series at washingtonpost.com/frontrunners. Michael E. Ruane will discuss his article today at noon.




