Not Their Money to Give Away

Saturday, December 22, 2007; Page A16

The Post was right to criticize judges for taking money from class- action lawsuit settlements and giving it to charities that they and other lawyers favor ["When Judges Get Generous," editorial, Dec. 17]. Law schools, religious groups and others are getting millions that should be going to consumers.

The problem is even worse in state courts than it is in federal courts.

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

In California, for example, state judges use class-action settlements for ideological purposes. Settlements intended to benefit consumers get paid instead to groups that lobby for affirmative action, hate-crimes laws, undocumented immigrants and public funding for abortion, even though many consumers have no interest in such political causes.

Class-action settlements are supposed to benefit the consumers in whose name the lawsuit is brought. All too often, consumers receive nothing more than worthless coupons in class-action settlements, while the lawyers involved get millions of dollars and the rest is given to special-interest groups.

HANS BADER

Counsel

Competitive Enterprise Institute

Washington


© 2007 The Washington Post Company