washingtonpost.com
A Vote for Energy Consumers

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

With regard to Sen. Mary Landrieu's vote last week on the energy bill, columnist Steven Pearlstein clearly demonstrated that he does not understand how a $12 billion tax increase on the oil and gas industry would burden American consumers [Sunday Briefing, Business, Dec. 16].

There is nothing "comprehensive" about an energy policy that unfairly punishes U.S. businesses. If Congress were to place additional taxes on domestically produced energy, the net effect would be a subsidy for foreign competitors and higher energy prices for everyone.

Ms. Landrieu's state is home to a $70 billion energy industry, and her concerns about a bill containing punitive tax measures were certainly warranted. Ms. Landrieu exhibited the courage to stand up for consumers who would have been left "footing the bill" for the ill-advised legislation.

At a time when this country is concerned about energy security, lawmakers should be taking steps to help make U.S. businesses more viable in the world market -- not less. Ms. Landrieu did just that when she exerted her independence, examined the facts and voted against the energy bill.

CHRIS JOHN

President, Louisiana Mid-Continent

Oil and Gas Association

Baton Rouge

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company