Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

The Many Factors Behind 2008's Bigger Raise for Federal Workers

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Stephen Barr
Monday, January 7, 2008

What a difference a year makes.

At the start of 2007, federal employees received an average raise of 2.2 percent, with about half receiving a 1.8 percent raise.

This year, federal employees will see their pay rise by an average of 3.5 percent. About half will get a 2.99 percent raise.

The differences in the raises largely can be attributed to the political process on Capitol Hill. At the end of 2006, Congress had not completed most of the annual appropriations bill and left it to President Bush to set the 2007 raise. Last month, Congress put together a consolidated spending bill and got Bush's signature before the year ended.

To be sure, the 2008 raise, ratified by Bush in an executive order Friday, was shaped by other considerations.

Those factors included data on wage growth in the private sector, a desire in Congress to give a solid raise to the armed forces during a war and efforts by Washington area members of Congress to renew support for the civil service, where baby-boom retirements are on the rise and agencies are finding it tougher to compete with the private sector for top talent.

"I know from having advocated for federal employees since I came to Congress that it's easier to rail against 'Washington bureaucrats' than to recognize the invaluable contributions these dedicated public servants make," Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) said in a written statement.

Federal employees, he said, "protect the homeland, fight crime, battle disease, ensure the wide variety of government functions on which we all depend operate properly and support our troops abroad."

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) played a pivotal role in moving this year's raise through Congress and said he was pleased that Bush took the final step to put the raise in place. "This adjustment will reap significant dividends both in terms of the morale of our federal workforce and in our efforts to recruit and retain vital government personnel," Hoyer said.

Washington area House members and senators "fought hard to secure a fair pay adjustment this year, and we will continue to do so in the future because we believe federal employees deserve compensation equal to that of the great contributions they make in service to this nation," he said.

The government's method of allocating the annual raise -- a 2.5 percent across-the-board increase and a geographic-based adjustment -- is helping federal employees in the Washington region. The government gives higher raises to certain metropolitan areas where officials think there is a sizable "pay gap" between the federal and private sectors.

As a result, federal employees here will receive a 4.49 percent increase this year. In the Washington area, the projected median federal salary will be $90,698. Last year, Washington area federal employees received a 2.64 percent raise.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company