» This Story:Read +| Comments

How to Judge the Training

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Sunday, January 20, 2008; Page A03

Diversity training and similar initiatives have positive effects when:

This Story

¿ Training is voluntary.

¿ The focus is on structural change, such as increased mentoring and rotations that give people a shot at high-profile assignments.

¿ The motivation is to advance business goals and to open up new markets.

¿ Companies set targets and hold executives responsible for meeting those targets.

Diversity training and other initiatives have negative effects when:

¿ Training is mandatory and emphasizes the risk of discrimination lawsuits and threats; for example, downloading government regulations to educate managers on how not to discriminate.

¿ Programs involve a few brief training workshops or online sessions that often focus on "sensitivity training" and interpersonal attitude change.

¿ The training emphasizes social justice goals and the need to redress historical wrongs.

Source: "Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies" by Alexandra Kalev, the University of California at Berkeley; Frank Dobbin, Harvard University; and Erin Kelly, the University of Minnesota.


» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company