'Does Not Appear to Be a Prudent Investment'

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, January 25, 2008; Page A06

Excerpts from a letter from Federal Transit Administration chief James S. Simpson to Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) regarding the Dulles rail project:

FTA is concerned that the cumulative risks and uncertainties that characterize the Dulles project in its current form are extremely likely to result in further cost escalation and schedule delays. Thus, the current Dulles Project does not appear to be a prudent investment under the New Starts program.

The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority may in time be able to overcome some of the concerns . . . however, the sheer number and magnitude of the current project's technical, financial and institutional risks and uncertainties are unprecedented for a candidate New Starts project.

FTA also is deeply concerned that, because [Metro] faces significant, unresolved capital funding needs for maintaining the current system, the proposed extension to Metrorail may pose serious financial and operational challenges, and further strain the system.

The Dulles Project . . . has encountered an extraordinarily large set of challenges including . . . a dramatically escalating budget, delays in the development of the public-private contract, local dissension about the design of the project, and lawsuits.


© 2008 The Washington Post Company