| Page 3 of 3 < |
A Conversation With Ehud Barak
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Can you say anything about the raid that Israel waged into Syria, supposedly against a nuclear facility, last September?
No.
Do you think that the Syrian track should be pursued?
I think that we have shown . . . a respect for Syria, its interests and its leaders. We expect from them to do the same regarding Israel. If this basic kind of element will be there, I think a Syrian track is . . . potentially positive.
I thought the U.S. has opposed Israel negotiating with Syria.
I think they realized in recent years that we understand the Syrian issue better.
There is a rumor that Pakistan is helping Saudi Arabia build a nuclear program.
I don't want to . . . I have no information.
It's clear that the real risk with Iran turning nuclear is that it will be the end of the non-proliferation regime because it will open the door on active proliferation. We already had a wake-up call from the case of A.Q. Khan, who was ready to sell to anyone, especially if he was a good Muslim. It's very dangerous that we will end up in 10 to 15 years with a nuclear device in the hands of terrorists.
You think in 10 years?
It's possible.




