Senator Confused By NFL's Decision To Destroy Tapes
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Saturday, February 2, 2008
PHOENIX, Feb. 1 -- With the New England Patriots in the Super Bowl and the sudden threat of Senate hearings on the destruction of tapes used to spy on opponents, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said Friday the league uncovered evidence of the Patriots potentially cheating at the end of the 2006 season and in 2007 preseason games.
He added the league discovered six tapes and subsequent notes that proved New England was illegally obtaining other teams' signals. But he said he ordered them destroyed after information about one tape was made public despite the league's best efforts to ensure it wouldn't be released.
Nonetheless, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said Friday he does not understand Goodell's reasons for destroying evidence and is considering asking the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which he is the ranking minority member, to look into the issue.
As is always the case when Congress looks into sports leagues, Specter raised the issue of the NFL's antitrust exemption and said at a news conference the topic "has been on my mind for a long time."
Speaking at his annual state of the league address, Goodell did not seem rattled by Specter, saying he would be willing to meet with the senator.
Goodell also seemed to play down the impact of the tapes, which were seized after the season's first week when the New York Jets said they caught the Patriots filming their defensive signals in a loss to New England at Giants Stadium. He said the tapes revealed exactly what New England officials told the league they would. He also questioned how much of an advantage the Patriots gained.
"In one of the tapes, a coach was waving at the cameras, showing that they knew they were being taped," Goodell said. "It's something that's done quite widely in sports, and teams prepare for that."
Still, he added, taping an opponent's signs upsets the competitive balance and still should be considered against the rules. Back when the Patriots were first caught, Goodell fined New England Coach Bill Belichick $500,000, which is the top amount a coach can be fined. He also took away one of the team's two No. 1 picks in this year's draft.
Goodell said it was important to destroy the tapes so the Patriots would not be able to gain a competitive edge from them.
"It was the best way to make sure the Patriots followed my instructions," he said. "I wanted to make sure that bit of information did not appear."
That way, he said, if more information surfaced, the league would know the Patriots had not been forthright when certified that they had given the league every piece of evidence that they spied on other teams.
When Goodell was asked why he wouldn't just lock up the evidence, he said the league thought it had when it first collected the notes and tapes but that information leaked out five days later. He said the NFL conducted an investigation but figured the best thing to do was to destroy the tapes. He said the tapes no longer served a purpose.


