| Page 2 of 2 < |
Should This Marriage Be Saved?
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Overseeing the talks to split the company will be chief executive Ralph W. Shrader, an engineer and 34-year veteran of the firm who took over in 1999 after his mentor and predecessor Bill Stasior retired. Shrader had worked in the commercial and government divisions, though he had spent most of his time in the latter.
A stickler for punctuality and grammar, Shrader is known as a disciplined manager who likes to see quantitative data before making a decision. And yet he also likes to exhort employees to add "heart" to their work. He found a love for golf late in life, leading to the company's three-year sponsorship of a PGA tournament. In speeches he occasionally notes how a receptionist hands out home-baked brownies to chief executives and generals visiting the McLean headquarters.
Shrader, who declined to be interviewed for this story, has not said how he feels about a split. He plans to retire in 2009 and stands to profit handsomely from a buyout. Should a decision be made to divide the company, he is likely to follow it through to the end, but people close to him aren't convinced he is 100 percent behind the move.
"I know he takes great pride in Booz Allen and rightly so, and I have thought he'd not have wanted to see the institution broken up or sold off," said a close associate of Shrader, who spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize their relationship.
Under Shrader, sales have more than doubled, to $4.1 billion, and the company's head count has doubled, to 20,000.
Shrader also expanded the company's ties to government -- he hired Dov S. Zakheim, an undersecretary of defense under Donald Rumsfeld, and R. James Woolsey Jr., a CIA director in the Clinton administration who joined the firm after Sept. 11, 2001, to work on homeland security issues but now has turned his attention to energy.
If the government unit is bought out, it will come as the boom in federal spending has started to slow.
"It's going to make it more difficult for companies in this business to make the profits they've expected to make because of the new administration," said Michael R. Steed, a partner in Paladin Capital Group, a District private-equity firm specializing in homeland security.
A split, meanwhile, could help free the commercial side, which now labors under some of the regulatory strictures required by Booz Allen's government work. Employees in both divisions must follow stringent spending and security guidelines, and they need always to prominently display their nationality -- on identification cards and in e-mails. For Booz Allen's business abroad, that's been particularly frustrating, especially in places that frown on U.S. involvement in Iraq.
The commercial side has other challenges. Years ago, it prospered as companies needed the help of consultants to manage logistics, supply chains and manufacturing plants. But as the service sector grew in prominence, Booz Allen has lagged behind competitors such as McKinsey and Bain that focus primarily on corporate strategy.
"We wanted to focus on that work as well as our traditional technology work, but if you were looking at the firm as a strategic consulting firm, we fell back," said Raymond J. Lane, a former Booz Allen employee who is now a prominent venture capitalist.
Michael Lent, a former Booz Allen employee, recently noted in his Government Services Insider newsletter that some current employees "have voiced in private concerns and uncertainties about prospective financial rewards, their future role under an outside owner, inevitable departures of valued colleagues, changes in a distinctive, successful culture, and the need to revise the brand in the government space under new ownership."
Outsiders say that splitting the company could weaken one of Booz Allen's strengths: the pairing of its two units gives it a deep reservoir of knowledge about what works in the government and commercial space.
"From the standpoint of sharing innovation between the public sector and the private sector, it's not a very good idea," said Lorrie Scardino, an analyst at the research firm Gartner.




