| Page 2 of 2 < |
Taking the Bus Is Not an Option
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
¿ Finally, buses would not be an attractive alternative to driving a car. The Dulles corridor is an affluent area with two or more cars in each household. The experience nationally has been that rail encourages people to ride transit. Buses would not.
The Dulles rail project has consistently complied with all Federal Transit Administration project requirements. The FTA has spent nearly $100 million in federal funds to study the project and has issued nearly 20 separate approvals. The entire project will require less than 20 percent federal funding (about $900 million) -- reversing the traditional federal share for highway construction. This level of state and local commitment should be rewarded, not questioned.
Dulles rail is one of the most important transit projects in the country, and I don't understand why its cost effectiveness is being questioned. Members of Congress from both parties have urged federal approval, including members of the House Republican leadership. The Bush administration should approve this project.
-- Paul M. Weyrich
Washington
The writer was a member of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission and is president and chief executive of the Free Congress Foundation.


Discussion Policy