| Page 2 of 2 < |
Hot Under the Collar Over Global Warming
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
Instead of investigating the claims made by the professors and scientists cited in the article, reporter Juliet Eilperin found it easier to slam them as crackpots and morons.
When explaining how the skeptics' group, the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), was formed to offer an opposing viewpoint to the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), she made sure to note:
"While the IPCC enlisted several hundred scientists from more than 100 countries to work over five years to produce its series of reports, the NIPCC document is the work of 23 authors from 15 nations, some of them not scientists," a blatant attempt to knock the group. But a little basic research would have revealed that the makeup of the IPCC itself is questionable.
MICHAEL BONGIOVI
Warrenton
