Assembly Passes Bill to Allow 'No Child' Opt-Out
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Sunday, March 9, 2008; Page C04
RICHMOND, March 8 -- Virginia's Board of Education would be directed to recommend whether the state should pull out of a federal school accountability system under legislation that cleared the General Assembly Saturday. It now awaits consideration by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D).
Virginia is among several states in which officials have argued that the federal government has failed to provide enough funding and flexibility to carry out the No Child Left Behind law, which requires annual testing in math and reading for many children.
The measure that passed the House on Friday and the Senate on Saturday would not have an immediate impact. If the Board of Education recommends withdrawal from the federal accountability system, the bill would require the board to present a plan to the governor and legislature by June 30, 2009.
Congress is considering whether to amend the 6-year-old federal law. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) has said he plans to introduce a bill this spring.
The federal law requires annual testing in grades three through eight and once in high school. Schools and school systems must show annual progress, and the results must include scores for subgroups of students such as ethnic minorities, disabled students and those with limited English skills.
The law has been credited with revealing pockets of struggling students. But states and localities have complained they are stuck with too much of the cost. Some also argue that the law is too rigid.
In January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit revived a lawsuit by the National Education Association and several school systems that challenged the law as an unfunded mandate. The U.S. Education Department is appealing.
Glod reported from Washington.


Discussion Policy![[Class Struggle]](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/05/06/GR2005050600419.gif)
![[Challenge Index]](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2008/05/16/GR2008051602334.gif)