Putting Food Safety First
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
It was telling, and unsurprising, that there was nothing relating to food in The Post's March 7 editorial "Fixing the FDA." Though food appears first in the Food and Drug Administration's name, food safety and nutrition play second fiddle to drugs at the agency.
The FDA regulates about 80 percent of America's food but receives only about a third of America's food-safety dollars. The remaining money is spent at the Agriculture Department, where again food safety is just one of many things the agribusiness-promoting agency tries to do.
The FDA clearly needs fixing, meaning, as The Post suggested, more money for inspections at pharmaceutical plants here and abroad -- but also at the farms, factories and processing facilities that supply America's foods. A still better fix would be to split the FDA into one well-funded agency devoted to drugs and a second food-safety agency that also includes the food-safety functions now at the Agriculture Department. Both food and medicines are too important to get second billing at any agency.
MICHAEL F. JACOBSON
Executive Director
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Washington
