Senate Gives Initial Approval to Installing Speed Cameras Across State

|
Discussion Policy Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. |
The Senate appears poised to pass a proposal by the administration of Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) to allow speed cameras in highway work zones and authorize Maryland's local jurisdictions to use cameras to enforce speed limits near schools and in residential neighborhoods.
The Senate gave preliminary approval to the measure, though some legislators voiced concerns with the bill, saying cameras could be an intrusion. The chamber amended the bill to exempt volunteer rescue workers heading to an emergency from being subject to speed-camera tickets.
Supporters of the bill have argued that the cameras would help prevent speeding-related accidents. Currently, Montgomery County is the only jurisdiction in the state authorized to use the cameras.
The Senate expects to hold a final vote on the measure as early as tomorrow. In the House, the Environmental Matters Committee expects to vote on a similar bill later this week and, if it passes, will send the bill to the House floor for full debate.
To Profit? Or Not to Profit?
Consumer groups faced off with the for-profit debt-counseling industry at a hearing yesterday before House lawmakers on legislation that would allow such companies to be licensed in the state.
Maryland now allows only nonprofit firms to help consumers with deep debts to manage their finances and improve their credit. A Columbia-based company, AscendOne, which does business in 35 states, has lobbied lawmakers for two years to support its efforts to operate in Maryland. The company's business practices are being investigated by several state attorneys general, including Maryland's.
The bill's House sponsor, Del. Brian J. Feldman (D-Montgomery), said the company and other for-profit debt counselors are unnecessarily being held to a higher standard than some nonprofit firms whose licenses have been revoked by the Internal Revenue Service because they were actually operating as for-profits.
But consumer groups, including the Maryland Public Interest Research Group and the Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition, said for-profit firms have little motivation to help consumers and a large incentive to profit from their troubles.
The Senate approved the bill last week. In past years, it has stalled in the House Economic Matters Committee, which held yesterday's hearing. Chairman Dereck E. Davis (D-Prince George's) said he plans to bring it to a vote this week or next.


Discussion Policy
![[Campaign Tracker]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/12/03/GR2007120301534.gif)
