washingtonpost.com
Hoyer Says Clinton-Obama Tensions May Hurt Democrats' Prospects

By Chris Cillizza and Eric Pianin
washingtonpost.com Staff Writers
Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:31 PM

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer acknowledged yesterday that the ongoing nomination fight between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama has the potential to cause a major fissure within the Democratic Party due to the deeply personal nature of the choice.

"When they attack one another, it's not just an attack on the other candidate, it is taken I think by women and by African Americans in a more personal sense," said Hoyer. "To that extent I think the continued clash between the two candidates, which is inevitable, is not particularly helpful."

The historic nature of the choice between Clinton and Obama has largely been cast as an unalloyed positive development for the Democratic party, but Hoyer said that strong identity politics at work in the race "tends to exacerbate the good feelings that the other candidate's supporters have for the candidate making the attack."

Hoyer (Md.), the second-ranking Democrat in the House, made his comments on "PostTalk," washingtonpost.com's video interview program with newsmakers.

In the last 72 hours, the rhetoric between Obama and Clinton ¿ particularly on the issue of race ¿ has become increasingly heated.

Following a comment by 1984 vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro that Obama would not be where he was as the front-runner in the Democratic contest if he was a white man, Obama adviser David Axelrod suggested that Clinton surrogates were intentionally bringing up the issue of race. "All this is part of an insidious pattern that needs to be addressed," said Axelrod.

Clinton distanced herself from Ferraro's comments but did not request that Ferraro break ties with the campaign. Late Wednesday, however, Ferraro did just that ¿ stepping down from Clinton's finance committee.

Hoyer, who remains neutral in the presidential race, praised Obama for his "amazing capacity to reach across racial divides" and condemned any comments made by either campaign that would seek to make a political issue of Clinton's gender or Obama's race.

While Hoyer had previously expressed his hope that the primary fight would be over by the spring, it has become abundantly clear following Clinton's wins in Ohio and Texas that neither candidate will secure enough pledged delegates to wrap up the nomination ¿ meaning that superdelegates, of which Hoyer is one, will decide the identity of the nominee.

Hoyer stood by his previous statement that superdelegates -- mostly elected officials and party leaders -- should act as independent operators when choosing between the two candidates ¿ using his own home state of Maryland as an example.

Maryland held its presidential primary on Feb. 12, a race won overwhelmingly by Obama. But, according to Hoyer, he and other Maryland superdelegates will not be called upon to choose a candidate until late August when the Democratic National Convention convenes in Denver.

With so much time having passed between the February vote and the August convention, it is unreasonable to assume that nothing in the race has changed and that if another vote were held in Maryland that the same result would occur, explained Hoyer.

"What I've said is I think . . . an awful lot of things can happen between Feb. 12 and the last week in August, and I will have to take all of that into consideration when I make a determination in August, or frankly before that."

Hoyer urged Obama and Clinton to downplay their differences and shift their attention to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, and his support of Bush administration economic policies "which have led to very, very tough times for working people and our country in general."

With polls consistently showing the economy as the top concern of voters, Hoyer said that the Democratic candidates must convince voters they are more capable than McCain to deal with an economic crisis including "deep debt, unemployment numbers that are rising, a stock market stuck in the mud and incomes that are down."

Last month, Congress approved a bipartisan, $152 billion economic stimulus package that will send government payments to most American households and grant tax incentives for business investments. The Federal Reserve has also taken steps to try to revive the economy and the housing credit markets, including Tuesday's decision to assume the risk of spurned mortgage securities.

Hoyer said it was possible Congress would take additional steps later this year, if the stimulus package signed by President Bush fails to turn around the economy by late summer. "If it has a positive impact, then we probably won't need another short-term stimulus," Hoyer said. "If it doesn't, then we'll have to look at other alternatives."

Meanwhile, he noted, the House Financial Services Committee chaired by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) is developing legislation to limit the damage done by the record number of foreclosures in the past year and to prevent new foreclosures. "No community is served, and very frankly the lenders aren't served by foreclosure, and we are seeing communities where 10, 20, 30, 40 percent of the homes in a particular neighborhood are being foreclosed on," Hoyer said.

Hoyer also hailed a House vote Tuesday night that revamped House ethics rules by creating an independent panel empowered to launch investigations of alleged misconduct by members of the chamber. The six-members of the new Office of Congressional Ethics would be made up of outsiders chosen by Democratic and House leaders.

Hoyer said it was crucial, in the wake of a series of congressional scandals and criminal convictions of former lawmakers, to demonstrate to the public that "we are trying to insure that their Congress, their representatives, are acting in a way that serves their interests, not the special interests."

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive