Less Pregnancy Intervention Is Better
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
I offer a much better way to fund Virginia's birth-injury program ["Free Care for Life, if Money Holds Out" March 6]. Let's address escalating malpractice insurance premiums by asking Virginia's obstetricians to pay a fee for every unnecessary medical intervention recommended to healthy, low-risk women. These interventions cause complications that could be avoided without them.
I recently gave birth as a 40-year-old at 42 weeks gestation. With any local obstetrician, I would have been offered an amniocentesis because of my advanced age, induced labor at a week past due, an epidural and possibly a cesarean section.
My midwife, who respects birth's natural process, offered no interventions. My pregnancy concluded with a beautiful, healthy birth.
If doctors were financially responsible for the unneeded interventions they push, we could minimize the cause of malpractice lawsuits. If doctors continued to act irresponsibly by offering these interventions to healthy women, the required fees would pay for Virginia to keep its promise.
ANNIE HAROLD
Arlington
