Fighting Phone Spam

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, March 14, 2008; Page A16

There is one partial solution to the problem described in the March 10 front-page article "Advertising Sent to Cellphones Opens New Front in War on Spam": Allow customers to opt out of all text messaging. Not all of us use our cellphones as general communication devices; some people are satisfied to let a phone be just a phone.

I know more than 25 people who have asked their wireless providers to disable text messaging for their accounts, only to be told that it could not be done, which I doubt. A more likely explanation is that these companies like getting paid for mistaken text messages.

The companies should voluntarily institute an opt-out policy or, loath as I am to suggest a new law, Congress should require that they do so, with hefty fines for noncompliance.

There is also a more technologically complex solution to this problem. Instead of making recipients pay for the text messages, make the sender pay for them. Yes, it would cost banks, travel firms and other businesses that text useful information, but they could pass those charges on to their customers.

DAVID S. SCHWARTZMAN

Rockville


© 2008 The Washington Post Company