| Page 2 of 2 < |
Nationals, D.C. Officials Tangle Over Street Vending, Controversial Sign

Buy Photo
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Sam Williams, the city's vending coordinator, said vendors who were at RFK and others who have applied will get spots outside the stadium. "We all want vendors to be out there on Opening Day," he said. "We have talked to lots of stakeholders in that community . . . about how to best add vending to the area. The stakeholders want to add opportunity in the area by creating vendor malls."
How far will the mall be from the action?
"Obviously, they want to be in the highest area of pedestrian traffic," Williams said. "What we've been doing is soliciting the opinions of RFK vendors. We're trying to act as liaisons between the vendors . . . and the community."
The community includes the Nationals, he said.
But council members said the Nationals can't have it all. The city wants space for vendors and its tax sign.
"I think it's time for them to be good partners," said Kwame R. Brown (D-At Large), who authored the legislation on the taxation sign. "This is not a one-sided relationship."
"Where better to put [a sign] than down at the stadium that we paid $611 million for?" said Brown, who is chairman of the council economic development committee.
Technically, the Nationals can do anything they want about the electronic board, said Gregory O'Dell, chief executive of the sports commission. "D.C. has a lease with the Nationals, and there is specific language on signage," he said.
The language says the lessee -- paying $6 million annually in rent -- is in charge.
O'Dell led a tour of the stadium yesterday for Gray and several members of his staff. They stepped over plywood and walked gingerly on plastic-covered rugs inside luxury suites and the players' locker room.
The chairman's group bumped into residents and others being guided by Nationals vice president Gregory McCarthy. Gray and McCarthy did not talk about the dispute. Later, McCarthy referred questions about the dispute to spokeswoman Chartese Burnett.
Burnett said Nationals President Stan Kasten, who had the authority to reply, was unavailable.
Gray said the recent tiffs remind him of the Nationals' decision to have its foundation arm hold an annual, glitzy fundraising affair at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center, the new development in Prince George's County that has become the city's chief rival for conventions and other events.
So far, nothing on the same scale has been planned within the District's borders.
"How can you have your marquee event in Maryland?" he asked.
The Nationals' stance has been that it is a regional team with a regional outreach.
Said Gray: "The District is on the hook for paying for this. Not Maryland. Not anyone else."







