| Page 3 of 3 < |
Compromise Preserves Board's Permitting Clout

Buy Photo
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The boards are trying to toughen environmental regulation in a business-friendly state. The state Chamber of Commerce had come to consider the boards an economic threat. Last summer, Chamber of Commerce President Hugh Keogh asked businesses in the state to contribute $5,000 each to support the effort.
"The bill is designed to provide for greater professionalism and accountability together with a more rational decision-making process," he wrote at that time.
The bill passed easily last year, but by last month, the balance of power had shifted. Last year, the General Assembly was dominated by Republicans; this year, the state Senate is controlled by Democrats. Sen. Patricia S. Ticer (D-Alexandria), new chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources, presided over hearings on the bill.
"She was there fighting for us," Pepper said.
Englin also had been strongly opposed to the original bill.
"It's a terrible idea to create an environmental czar, vesting all the authority in one person and stripping the community of the ability to play a role in controversial environmental permitting issues that affect their health and safety," he said. "My experience with that agency is that where they have an opportunity to exercise discretion, they do it in favor of industry, not in favor of environmental quality."
Anderson, of the Chamber of Commerce, disagreed, saying it was "very unjust" to characterize the Department of Environmental Quality in that way.
"The DEQ is not a pushover to industry," he said.
Englin said the final bill ended up being a good piece of environmental legislation.
"It's a good outcome for Alexandria and a good outcome for the state," he said. "It means communities can continue to play a role in controversial environmental permitting decisions that affect them."


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




