Fossils Push Back Bipedalism to 6 Million Years Ago
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, March 20, 2008; 12:00 AM
THURSDAY, March 20 (HealthDay News) -- Far from being a recent, revolutionary development, the ability to walk upright on two legs began at the dawn of human evolution more than six million years ago, new research confirms.
The first detailed examination of the fossilized thigh bones of a 4-foot tall creature calledOrrorin tugenensissupports the notion that this very early member of the hominin family tree was bipedal, anthropologists say.
"Upright walking is one of the very first traits in our lineage to occur. So this finding reinforces that and pushes the date back even farther," said study co-author Brian Richmond, associate professor of anthropology at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
But the study also suggests that bipedalism changed through succeeding millennia, and that, biomechanically speaking,O. tugenensisprobably walked differently than modern humans.
Richmond and a colleague, William Jungers, of Stony Brook University in Stony Brook, N.Y., published their findings in the March 21 issue ofScience.
French anthropologists first discovered the six-million-year-old group of fossil thigh bones, hand bones and teeth in Kenya in 2000.O. tugenesis-- about the size of today's chimpanzees -- lived in an era close to the very origins of human evolution.
"It's right in the time period where we think chimpanzees and humans first split from each other -- about 5 to 8 million years ago," Richmond said.
Bipedalism was crucial to human development because it "freed up our hands," Richmond explained. These free forelimbs allowed humans and their ancestors to begin to explore the use of tools, for example. Expanded brain size may also have accompanied (and been encouraged by) bipedalism, anthropologists say.
But wasO. tugenensistruly human-like? Because bipedalism is a key trait separating hominins from other primates, a close look at the bones -- the thigh bone, especially -- was necessary.
"We took a simple caliper and measured the size of the hip joint and the strength of the shaft of the bone," Richmond said. "Our analysis showed that the overall shape profile of the bone really closely resembles early human fossils from about three to two million years ago."
Those fossils -- of hominins such asAustralopithecus(such as the famous "Lucy"), andParanthropus-- inhabited East Africa just prior to the emergence of the genusHomo, which includes today'sHomo sapiens.
That means that "the overall theme of upright walking remained the same for the majority of our evolutionary history," fromO. tugenensisstraight up toAustralopithecus, Richmond said.
But about two million years ago, an environmental shift occurred within East Africa, changing forests into grasslands, forcing hominins to rely even more on walking as they looked for food.
"There was dramatic change in hip structure then that was probably related to longer-distance walking and gave us the capabilities that we have today," Richmond said. "We see the origins of the genusHomothen, with these long striding legs, a very different kind of body shape," compared toO. tugenensisorAustralopithecus, he said.
That's whyO. tugenesisbones more closely resemble those ofAustralopithecusrather thanHomo sapiens, even though all three species are related and walked upright, he added.
Signs of strong musculature on the upper limbs, as well as fingers designed for climbing, also suggest thatO. tugenensisprobably split time between the trees and ground. "When they were on the ground they were on two legs, but they probably climbed trees regularly to get food, to escape predators, to sleep at night," Richmond said.
One anthropology expert called the new study "a marvelous piece of detective work."
Richmond and Jungers "are taking the knowledge of what it means to be bipedal to a new level of understanding," said Jeffrey Laitman, a functional morphologist and director of the Center for Anatomy and Functional Morphology at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, in New York City.
Besides fixingO. tugenesisfirmly within the hominin lineage, the new work "is causing scientists to search for and understand the nuances of functional morphology of bipedalism, and how it came to be," Laitman said.
The exact trigger for the shift from walking on four legs to two remains a tantalizing mystery, Richmond said. And he stressed that if Africa's climate hadn't changed, who's to say that evolution would have moved away from the successfulAustralopithecus, and led toHomo sapiens?
As Richmond said: "The way we are today is not necessarily the way we had to have been. We are not the necessary endpoint."
More information
To learn more about human evolution, visit Minnesota State University.
SOURCES: Brian Richmond, Ph.D., assistant professor, Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; Jeffrey Laitman, Ph.D., professor, and director, Center for Anatomy and Functional Morphology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City; March 21, 2008,Science



