Government's Health-Care Track Record
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
One wonders what there is about the performance of our current government-run health- care programs that justifies Jacob S. Hacker's faith in "socialized medicine." ["Let's Try a Dose. We're Bound to Feel Better," Outlook, March 23]. Mr. Hacker cited Medicare as successful, but that program is running a long-term deficit of $50 trillion to $70 trillion. Despite all this money, studies have repeatedly shown that the quality of care provided is wildly uneven and pretty much mediocre overall.
Other government health-care programs are even worse. The Veterans Administration health system is a national disgrace. Medicaid is threatening to bankrupt state governments, yet it notoriously under-reimburses doctors, driving them out of the program and sending patients to emergency rooms for care. This is not a track record that inspires confidence.
The U.S. government has mismanaged everything from Iraq to Hurricane Katrina. It has run up $15.5 trillion in unfunded liabilities for Social Security and still can't find Osama bin Laden. We should think twice before we let it become our national doctor.
MICHAEL TANNER
Director, Health and Welfare Studies
Cato Institute
Washington
