| Page 2 of 2 < |
Mediator Guiding Deal on Va. Tech
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Washington law firm Bode & Grenier, which represents more than two dozen of the family members, also declined to comment.
Several relatives also declined to publicly discuss the offer or did not return phone messages. The families were initially told they had until March 31 to accept the offer. But some relatives said they were told Tuesday that the state is extending the deadline to give them more time to consider their options.
Roger O'Dell of Roanoke, whose son Derek was wounded, said families' sentiments about the offer range from " 'The university and Virginia did not do anything wrong, and there is no obligation to pay anyone any money' to 'Yes, there is serious wrongdoing, and the university and the commonwealth owe us all $2 million each.' "
"It is going to be very hard to please everybody," he said.
Any settlement or payout from the state would be in addition to the $8.5 million in private donations that Virginia Tech distributed to the victims and their families in the fall.
The families of those killed in the shooting by Virginia Tech student Seung Hui Cho of Fairfax County received tax-free payments of $208,000 unless they wanted a portion of the money to be used for a memorial scholarship.
The claims filed by victims against the state in October alleged that Virginia Tech and the state were negligent because they failed to respond to Cho's mental disorder soon enough, did not quickly lock down the campus the day of the shootings and failed to have an effective emergency response plan. Cho killed himself.
State officials had said Virginia's liability would be limited because of the legal protection known as "sovereign immunity," which means that the state can do no wrong and cannot be sued. In the 1970s, the General Assembly waived the state's immunity for tort claims but capped potential damages at $100,000.
Attorneys for the victims and state officials said there can be exceptions to that cap if defendants can prove "gross negligence."
"I think there are really difficult questions about what a jury would find if you took the case to court," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.
Tobias said families of the victims are probably conflicted over whether they prefer to have their concerns aired in court.
"I think these people are litigating not about money, and if it is not about the money, then they are not going to settle it," Tobias said. "I think in some ways, the [families] maybe really want their day in court."
Senate Majority Leader Richard L. Saslaw (D-Fairfax) predicted that the General Assembly would quickly get behind any settlement, saying he has full confidence in Kaine and McDonnell to act in the state's best interest.
"I hope they take it," Saslaw said of the offer to the families.


