Q:

We have questions. Questions about questions.

Discussion Policy

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

We have questions. Questions about questions.

Q: Are certain questions out of bounds?

Q: Was it inappropriate for a college student to ask Chelsea Clinton on Tuesday whether her mom's credibility had suffered from her handling of the Monica Lewinsky scandal?

Q: Is it true, as Chelsea suggested in her terse response, that the topic isn't "any of your business"?

Q: Or did her dad's conduct make it the nation's business?

Q. Does Chelsea's role as a campaign surrogate who's chosen to put herself in the public eye make her subject to questions about her mom's experience as first lady -- even the unpleasant stuff?

Q: Or are the rules different because this is personal for her, as her audience seemed to think when they applauded her answer?

( Q: And does America still think of Chelsea as an adolescent who needs to be protected?)

Q: Does intent matter? If the student, who says he's a Hillary Clinton supporter, was truly hoping to hear Chelsea discuss "what makes Hillary so strong," was her response an overreaction?

Q: Or is any query that alludes to the name "Lewinsky" gratuitously salacious?

Just asking . . .

-- Libby Copeland