Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

Secret's Out: They Want Strong Intelligence Chiefs

Mike McConnell, director of national intelligence, wants employees evaluated under new standards.
Mike McConnell, director of national intelligence, wants employees evaluated under new standards. (Freddie Lee - AP)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Stephen Barr
Thursday, March 27, 2008

By and large, the 100,000 employees in the U.S. intelligence community have the same workplace concerns as the rest of the government.

Only 28 percent think their bosses take steps to deal with colleagues who slack off at work, and less than half -- 47 percent -- are satisfied with the policies and practices of their senior leaders, according to an employee survey released this week by the director of national intelligence.

On average, the keepers of the nation's secrets rate their leaders more favorably than employees across the government. But employees in intelligence jobs, like other white-collar federal workers, want stronger leadership in their agencies.

The survey found that 45 percent of respondents in the intelligence community agreed with the statement that their leaders "generate high levels of motivation and commitment." In comparison, 38 percent of federal employees in a government-wide survey agreed.

It is difficult to parse survey results, in large part because many respondents choose "neutral" or "don't know." On the statement about their leaders inspiring and motivating employees, 29 percent were neutral and 25 percent disagreed, or were negative, with the rest in the don't know category.

Still, it is "clearly an improvement area," said Ronald P. Sanders, who heads up personnel policy for the director of national intelligence.

The intelligence community, as it is called inside the government, is a mix of civilian and military personnel, housed in 16 agencies. The summary did not provide agency-by-agency comparisons.

The survey, conducted from October to January, does not seem to show any widespread morale problems in the intelligence community, which had been caught up in controversy over how best to evaluate threats posed by Iraq and Iran.

More than 80 percent of the employees surveyed said they like their work, believe their work is important and enjoy the support of supervisors when balancing work and family issues.

Still, less than half of the intelligence employees, 41 percent, think promotions are based on merit. Twenty-four percent disagreed, and 36 percent had no opinion. Only 28 percent think pay raises are linked to job performance, while 33 percent said they were not, with the rest undecided.

Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, has called for intelligence employees to be evaluated against common standards for how well they analyze problems, share information and stand behind their professional judgments. The new performance standards are to take effect no later than Oct. 1.

McConnell also wants to break down barriers between the intelligence agencies and to broaden the experience and knowledge of intelligence officers. One effort involves "joint duty" under which employees seek assignments in other intelligence agencies in order to qualify for promotions into the top ranks.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company