» This Story:Read +| Comments

Now Blooming: Digital Models

2 Students Offer Futuristic Alternatives To Traditional Peak Blossom Forecasts

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 29, 2008; Page B01

Every year Rob DeFeo consults nature to figure out when Washington's cherry blossoms will bloom. The National Park Service chief horticulturalist, who has rough hands and wears a battered leather jacket, studies plants and trees, ponders seasons past and taps instincts born of decades watching winter turn to spring.

This Story

Millions of dollars ride on his forecast, as does as the fate of the city's annual tourist extravaganza, which begins today. DeFeo says he has been on target 13 out of 16 years.

But now come Virginia Tech's Vidhya Dass and Elizabeth Brennan, students armed with artificial neural networks, evolutionary computations, the Arrhenius equation, linear regression and something called fuzzy logic to suggest an alternative to DeFeo's seasoned eye.

Which is to say: Might the brain of a computer some day match human blossom intuition?

It is, if you will, algorithm vs. biorhythm, a finger on the "enter" button vs. a finger in the wind, artificial intelligence vs. a guy who once had 300 species of azaleas in his yard.

The students' idea grew out of an artificial intelligence class they took last spring as part of a master's program at Virginia Tech's Falls Church campus. Their teacher, assistant professor Chang-Tien Lu, suggested that they try using artificial intelligence to predict the peak bloom period.

The task has traditionally been done by DeFeo, 52, a wry New Jersey native and lifelong horticulturist who is an expert on the life and lore of the renowned cherry blossoms.

DeFeo scrutinizes such things as early flowering elms, maples and cornelian cherry dogwoods, as well as the weather and other recurring clues to the advent of spring.

This year, according to the forecast he issued this month, the peak bloom period would be from March 27 through April 3. He said yesterday that today will be the peak bloom day, when 70 percent of the blossoms are open. The bloom generally continues for several days beyond the peak period, depending on the weather.

Dass, 33, a native of India, and Brennan, 24, who hails from Baltimore, set out to see whether a computer model might, theoretically, do as well or better, making it easier for tourists to plan visits and officials to plan the National Cherry Blossom Festival.

"We hoped to create a model that would allow the best prediction with the minimum amount of input," Brennan said, meaning as early in the season as possible. The goal was "to see how our artificial techniques compared to human methods."

They tried an array of computer methods to see how each worked, the two said in interviews this week. They produced a paper last spring based on the research.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Metro Section

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

Virginia Politics

Blog: Va. Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

D.C. Taxi Fares

D.C. Taxi Fares

Compare estimated zoned and metered D.C. taxi fares with this interactive calculator.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company