Back to the Future at Harvard

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Monday, March 31, 2008

I can't believe that Ruth Marcus fell for the "reasonable accommodation" ruse ["Hijabs at a Harvard Gym," op-ed, March 26].

The game of accommodation-leads-to-restriction-leads-to-prohibition is dangerously addictive and can lead to destructive, unintended consequences. First it's only one gym, then a swimming pool. Next might be the demand that women at Harvard wear a little more clothing -- you know, just a reasonable amount more.

Finally these Muslim women, denied the opportunity to pursue higher education in Muslim-dominated societies, will demand the separation of men from women in classes.

Perhaps Harvard will accommodate them -- reasonably, of course -- by establishing a women's college to insulate these acutely sensitive women from the pernicious influence of men.

They could call it Radcliffe College.

KEN GOLDSTEIN

Washington



© 2008 The Washington Post Company