Al Gore's Climate Campaign

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, April 4, 2008; Page A22

Al Gore has announced that he will raise and spend $300 million in an effort to persuade the public and elected officials to support his climate change agenda [news story, March 31]. I wonder how campaign finance "reformers" and ethics "watchdogs" who continually bemoan the fact that private citizens are allowed to spend money to influence public opinion and political debate will react to Mr. Gore's campaign.

I also wonder whether the media will find it newsworthy and even scandalous that some contributors to Mr. Gore's effort will be venture capitalists or businesses that stand to reap billions of dollars in profits if Mr. Gore's agenda is enacted. The Post certainly thought it newsworthy that some global warming skeptics are funded at least in part by oil and coal interests.

Perhaps it would be better if, rather than squabbling over who is funding whom and what "special interests" they represent, news coverage and public discussion instead focused on whether Mr. Gore or the skeptics make the better scientific, economic, and policy arguments. I fear the reformers and watchdogs have so poisoned the well that having a rational discussion on this and other issues will be impossible.

SEAN PARNELL

President

Center for Competitive Politics

Alexandria


© 2009 The Washington Post Company