| Page 3 of 3 < |
Justices Uphold Lethal Injection Procedure
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The headline on a statement from the clinic showed how death penalty opponents view the decision: "Nationwide Lethal Injection Challenges to Move Forward."
Roberts sought to head off such interpretations.
"A state with a lethal injection protocol substantially similar to the protocol we uphold today would not create a risk" that would be unconstitutional, he wrote.
In Virginia, the court's decision clears the way for several executions unless Kaine intervenes based on clemency requests. Kevin Green, who killed a south-central Virginia convenience store owner in 1998, is scheduled to be executed May 27, according to the state attorney general's office.
Maryland's highest court ruled in December 2006 that the state's lethal injection procedures had not been properly adopted.
Republican leaders yesterday called on Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) to issue regulations needed to allow executions to resume. But O'Malley, a death penalty opponent, noted that the General Assembly has approved a commission to study the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent and the costs associated with it.
Staff writers William Branigin, Tim Craig and John Wagner contributed to this report.


![[The Supreme Court]](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/10/21/GR2005102100770.gif)
![[Guantanamo Prison]](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2005/04/04/PH2005040400425.jpg)
