MARYLAND BUDGET

Officials Trade Barbs Over Slots

Rivalry Between Governor, Comptroller Overshadows Gambling Debate

Gov. Martin O'Malley says Franchot is a
Gov. Martin O'Malley says Franchot is a "hypocrite" for abandoning his earlier support for slot machines. (Robert A. Reeder - Ftwp)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By John Wagner
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 17, 2008; Page B04

Maryland's battle over legalizing slot machine gambling sharply escalated yesterday, with Gov. Martin O'Malley attacking Comptroller Peter Franchot as a hypocrite shortly before Franchot helped kick off a campaign to defeat a November referendum on the issue.

O'Malley (D), who is counting on slots revenue to balance the state budget in future years, pointed to Franchot's past support of slots as recently as 2001 while a member of the House of Delegates.

"The comptroller has had the wonderful luxury of sitting back and doing nothing to help us restore fiscal responsibility while throwing stones in a hypocritical way," O'Malley told reporters. "He's not at all ever troubled by his inherent contradictions, and he never saw two sides of an issue that he couldn't be simultaneously in favor of."

The slots referendum was authorized by the General Assembly last fall as part of a special session called to address the state's long-term finances. Lawmakers also approved $1.4 billion in annual tax increases and one of several rounds of budget cuts that have occurred since O'Malley took office last year.

As a Montgomery County delegate, Franchot (D) twice co-sponsored unsuccessful bills to legalize slot-machine gambling, in 1998 and in 2001. Franchot has acknowledged that his position has changed, saying yesterday that he has been a consistent slots opponent for the past seven years.

Franchot yesterday urged Marylanders not to buy arguments from O'Malley and others who have suggested that additional budget cuts or tax increases might be needed if the referendum fails.

"Consider the source," Franchot said at the campaign kickoff. "This fact is indisputable: The same folks who are pushing slots just passed through the largest tax increase in state history."

O'Malley and Franchot have clashed over several issues since taking office 15 months ago, and the animosity between their staffs is well known in Annapolis. Yesterday's comments, however, were by far the harshest O'Malley has leveled at Franchot, whose chief duty is as the state's tax collector.

O'Malley and Franchot both sit on the Board of Public Works, a panel that approves state contracts. O'Malley made his comments shortly after the panel's meeting ended yesterday.

Franchot later said he considered what O'Malley said "unfortunate."

"It is highly unusual for a sitting governor to attack another statewide official, especially a member of his own party," Franchot spokesman Joseph Shapiro said in a statement. "However, that is exactly what Governor O'Malley did today, and it is regrettable."

As a candidate for governor in 2006, O'Malley advocated allowing only a limited number of slot machines at racetracks and once called the idea of using slots proceeds to fund education "morally bankrupt." His position has since evolved.


CONTINUED     1        >

More from Maryland

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Slots for MOCO? Taxes to balance the budget? Get the latest updates here.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company