Principles and Public Financing
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
In criticizing Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) as wavering on whether to participate in the public campaign financing system ["A Lapsed Principle," editorial, April 14], The Post overlooked two obvious -- and relevant -- points:
First, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) already opted into and then asserted that he opted out of the presidential public financing system. In short, Mr. McCain has been given a free pass on criticizing Mr. Obama for considering the same course of action that Mr. McCain has already taken. Moreover, Mr. McCain's decision is tainted by a "sweetheart loan" about which the Federal Election Commission has said it has questions.
Second, adviser-lobbyist Charles Black has said that the McCain campaign won't decide until July or August whether to opt into the public financing system. More double talk.
Each candidate will make a decision to opt into the presidential public financing system according to whether doing so will help him or her win.
The principle to which we all ought to look for guidance as to whether a candidate supports campaign finance reform is whether that candidate has pledged to make public financing of all federal races a priority if he or she is elected.
Mr. Obama has given that pledge. Mr. McCain hasn't.
DAVID DONNELLY
National Campaigns Director
Public Campaign Action Fund
Washington
