School Deal Disappoints Montgomery

O'Malley Had Backed More for Construction

Sen. Rona E. Kramer (D) says the governor is
Sen. Rona E. Kramer (D) says the governor is "taking the county for granted." (By Robert A. Reeder For The Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 24, 2008; Page B01

A key state committee has recommended allocating $46.3 million for school construction in Montgomery County next year, shy of a $55 million goal to which Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) agreed as he was courting the votes of Montgomery lawmakers during a special legislative session last fall.

A spokesman for County Executive Isiah Leggett (D) and several Montgomery lawmakers voiced disappointment yesterday, citing the county's large school construction needs and Leggett's work to build support for O'Malley's proposals during the special session. As part of his plan to address looming budget deficits, O'Malley pushed for a package of tax increases as well as a referendum on legalizing slot-machine gambling.

"I think he's not sensitive to the needs of Montgomery County, and that he's taking the county for granted," said Sen. Rona E. Kramer (D-Montgomery), chairman of the county's Senate delegation.

The recommendations of the Interagency Committee on School Construction are scheduled for consideration next month by the Board of Public Works, a three-member panel on which O'Malley sits, along with the state treasurer and comptroller.

O'Malley spokesman Rick Abbruzzese said the governor will continue to study the committee's recommendation but said it is "unlikely" that the Board of Public Works will alter the allocations.

"Forty-six million is a tremendous amount of money," Abbruzzese said. "Given the budget challenges we face, it's an incredible accomplishment."

Under the recommendations, Montgomery would receive $5 million more for school construction next year than any other jurisdiction. Three other large jurisdictions -- Prince George's County and the city and county of Baltimore -- would each get $41 million from a total allocation of $340 million.

"We tried to achieve a very fair distribution," said David Lever, executive director of the committee that made the recommendations. "There are needs across the state."

Through a spokesman, Leggett said yesterday that he was "very disappointed" in Montgomery's $46.3 million allocation.

"We are going to continue to work on this," said Leggett spokesman Patrick Lacefield.

Some Montgomery lawmakers, however, acknowledged the long odds against a better outcome before the Board of Public Works, even though two of the board's members -- Comptroller Peter Franchot (D) and Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp (D) -- once represented Montgomery in the legislature.

"It's very difficult for the Board of Public Works to realign the distribution because the board would be taking away money from others to give to us, which understandably the board would be reluctant to do," said Sen. Richard S. Madaleno Jr. (D-Montgomery). He said he found the situation "unacceptable."


CONTINUED     1        >

More from Maryland

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Slots for MOCO? Taxes to balance the budget? Get the latest updates here.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company