A Seasoned Command
President Bush wisely promotes his two most successful generals in Iraq.
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
PRESIDENT BUSH has done his successor a great favor by nominating Gen. David H. Petraeus as the new chief of U.S. military operations in the Middle East and Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno to replace him as the top commander in Iraq. The two generals worked in close cooperation last year to carry out the "surge" of U.S. forces in Iraq; their counterinsurgency tactics prevented an Iraqi civil war and reduced violence by up to 75 percent. By teaming them again, and giving Gen. Petraeus overall responsibility for the region as head of U.S. Central Command, Mr. Bush has improved the odds that the next administration will be able to sustain the gains in Iraq while gradually drawing down forces.
Gen. Petraeus's appointment also improves the chances that the United States will develop a coherent strategy for facing the multiple threats it now confronts across the Middle East and southern Asia -- something it conspicuously lacks. Two weeks ago, Democratic senators sought to score points during testimony by Gen. Petraeus by pressing him to concede that the threat from al-Qaeda is greater in Afghanistan and Pakistan than it is in Iraq. The questioning, which was reiterated Wednesday by Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) in reaction to the new appointments, overlooks the fact that al-Qaeda is now weaker in Iraq precisely because of the military successes of the past year. But the larger point it misses is that Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq are all pieces of a larger problem requiring a comprehensive approach. It's not possible to exclude Iraq from that strategy any more than it would make sense to focus all U.S. resources there.
Gen. Petraeus showed during his recent testimony that he recognizes the growing threat to U.S. interests posed by Iran -- one that manifests itself not only in attacks by Tehran-backed "special groups" on American soldiers in Iraq and in the ongoing Iranian nuclear program but in support for anti-Western militias and terrorists in Afghanistan, Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. Iran's bid for hegemony over the Middle East must be countered by a sophisticated strategy -- one in which diplomacy should play a major role but in which military action cannot be ruled out.
The United States has been slow to learn how to effectively fight the wars that followed the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Gen. Odierno, for example, was heavily criticized following his first tour of Iraq in 2003 because the tactics of his 4th Infantry Division were said to have caused excessive civilian casualties and contributed to the Sunni insurgency. Now Gens. Odierno and Petraeus are seasoned directors of a new counterinsurgency strategy that incorporates the painful lessons absorbed by the U.S. military during the past five years. By keeping them in the region, Mr. Bush will give the next president the opportunity not to repeat his own administration's history of mistakes caused by ignorance, inexperience and illusions. The Senate should swiftly confirm the nominations.


