| Page 3 of 3 < |
S. Korean Principles Vs. Hunger in North

|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Inside the Seoul government, there are mid-level specialists in inter-Korean relations who argue that South Korea cannot afford to put human rights ahead of economic ties, family reunification and long-term cooperation.
"Lee has yet to learn that finger-pointing on human rights is a dead-end policy," said one longtime government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "It is perceived by the North Korean government as a challenge to their national identity."
North Korea has indeed bristled. It has test-fired missiles into the sea, expelled South Korean officials from an industrial park in the North and unleashed a snarling torrent of rhetoric, threatening to turn South Korea into "ashes" and describing Lee's policies as "ignorant" and "fascist."
With its dander up, the North has so far refrained from asking South Korea for the food and fertilizer that it desperately needs to avoid widespread hunger. Even if it does ask, it is now too late for fertilizer to be delivered in time to help the crop that will be harvested in the fall.
History suggests that human rights concerns cannot trump other issues on the Korean Peninsula, said Kim, the researcher at the Korea Institute for National Unification.
"We have to exercise more tact," he said.
Special correspondent Stella Kim contributed to this report.





