'Co-Creation' Is Your Latest Invention

Facebook is one of the most visible examples of a product essentially created by the user.
Facebook is one of the most visible examples of a product essentially created by the user. (By Juana Arias -- The Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo     Buy Photo
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Geoffrey Colvin
Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Today's most innovative companies are learning to collaborate with customers on completely unique products.

The Times of London calls C.K. Prahalad "the No. 1 most influential management thinker in the world," and I wouldn't argue. He is about to contribute another large idea to business. It's worth understanding for many reasons, not least because it offers a preview of what qualities tomorrow's most accomplished businesspeople will need.

The buzzword you'll be hearing and using a lot more is "co-creation." It's the latest addition to the Prahalad lexicon, which you're already using, perhaps without knowing it. If you've ever talked about "core competencies" or "strategic intent" or "the fortune at the bottom of the pyramid," you're using terms he invented (with Gary Hamel in the first two cases). Co-creation is a key concept in his new book, "The New Age of Innovation," written with M.S. Krishnan; Prahalad and Krishnan are professors at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business.

The idea is that the most successful companies no longer invent new products and services on their own. They create them along with their customers, and they do it in a way that produces a unique experience for each customer. The critically important corollary is that no company owns enough resources -- or can possibly own enough -- to furnish unique experiences for every customer, so companies must organize a constantly shifting global web of suppliers and partners to do the job.

Those ideas beg for examples. The starkest involve the Internet. Facebook isn't a product or a service, but rather a platform on which users create their own unique experiences. Since it opened itself to software applications created by outsiders a year ago, more than 20,000 have appeared. Facebook (estimated value: $10 billion or more) couldn't possibly do all this on its own. The whole user experience is co-created.

Another example: the iPod. Apple invented the device, but users create their own experiences by loading it with music, TV shows, podcasts, and other independently created content, some of which exists because the iPod is available for it. Apple makes deals for some of the content, which it couldn't create on its own, to be available through the online iTunes store.

Prahalad and Krishnan also describe a radically different example that suggests broader possibilities. Suppose the health-insurance premiums of a customer with diabetes could be reset continually based on monitoring of that person's vital signs and compliance with a regimen of diet, exercise and medication. In theory that model is possible today, and an early version is being used by ICICI Prudential insurance in India. The service and what it costs are continually co-created by the customer and the company in conjunction with a network of doctors, exercise facilities and pharmaceutical firms that have joined the project.

If this sounds like the old mass-customization idea, it decidedly isn't. That concept was about a company offering customers many choices on a wide range of product or service attributes, but the company still had to decide which choices to offer and then deliver them. In co-creation, the choices are infinite, and the company neither imagines nor delivers them all. Similarly, if this sounds like Web 2.0, it sort of is, but it's much bigger, since it's more than an Internet phenomenon.

The challenges are clear. Most companies, especially old ones, are organized exactly wrong to capitalize on co-creation. They're built around the processes of creating products and services and managing owned resources -- just the opposite of the skills needed in the new model. In the same way, most managers (especially old ones) lack an intuitive feel for how the new model works.

An even greater challenge, which Prahalad and Krishnan don't address directly, is simply imagining where we go next. After all, we're talking here about the latest effects of the megatrend of our time: ubiquitous, ever-cheaper infotech. The trend has been apparent for decades, yet seeing very far into where it will lead has been almost impossibly hard. It may well be that the most valuable quality in a businessperson today is fearless imagination. That trait will always be scarce. For now, as a look just slightly into the future, Prahalad and Krishnan's vision will do nicely.

Geoffrey Colvin is a senior editor at large for Fortune magazine.



© 2008 The Washington Post Company