Page 2 of 2   <      

Lawmakers Accused of Flouting Rules on Use of Staff

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

In 2006, the House ethics committee struck a deal with Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) after investigating allegations that he ordered his legislative staffers to work on political campaigns, baby-sit for him and pick up his dry cleaning. The committee announced that Conyers acknowledged a "lack of clarity" in his communication with staff members regarding their official duties and responsibilities, according to a statement released at the time.

Deanna Maher, whose concerns gave rise to the ethics complaint, said yesterday that Conyers forced her to stump for candidates in local races and baby-sit his two sons while she worked as a deputy chief of staff in his Detroit office from 1998 until she quit in 2005.

Abuse of congressional staff by lawmakers is widespread, she said. "With staffers I talked to, it was a topic of conversation," she said. "I'm not saying all of them do it, but it's entrenched."

The issue surfaced anew Friday, when U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema sentenced Flores to six months in prison for embezzling $169,000 from congressional accounts controlled by Abercrombie and Harman.

Brinkema reduced Flores's prison term in part because she is cooperating with an early-stage inquiry by the Justice Department's public integrity section into misuse of resources, according to a source familiar with the case.

Current aides to Abercrombie and Harman said they take unusual care to abide by the rules, which campaign finance expert Kenneth Gross said can be "very vague." Neither Abercrombie nor Harman faced strong opposition in their 2006 races, reducing their need for get-out-the-vote drives and other labor-intensive efforts.

"A lot of campaigns outsource the fundraising services and even the event services," Gross said, pointing out he was not addressing allegations about the two lawmakers. "You do try to get volunteers, but usually you will have some paid staff involved in that, too."

Harman spent $1.2 million in the 2006 cycle. Over the two-year span, the "Friends of Jane Harman" campaign made just three payments to individuals not associated with campaign, consulting and polling firms, including a $5,000 consulting payment to a staffer who also served as the communications director in Harman's legislative office, records show.

Abercrombie's campaign is almost a "totally volunteer-centric situation," Helfert said, though three outside consultants have been on his campaign payroll.

In the 2006 election cycle, he spent more than $810,000. But, as has been the case for the last five years, no paid staff members worked for the campaign, according to MoneyLine's analysis of campaign spending.

The "Abercrombie for Congress" campaign paid for everything from $67,000 in catering for a fundraiser to $39,000 for office rent and $4,278 for Christmas cards to be printed and mailed. Aside from the consultants, however, there are no records of who staffed the campaign office or who sent out the holiday cards.

Staff writer Lyndsey Layton and staff researcher Madonna Lebling contributed to this report.


<       2


More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company