» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
Page 2 of 2   <      

Clearwire, Sprint Nextel Set Course for WiMax

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Wireless pioneer Craig McCaw will continue to act as chairman of Clearwire as will its current chief executive, Benjamin Wolff, and the company will eventually have an initial public offering. Sprint will hold a majority stake of 51 percent in the company, Clearwire will own 27 percent and its investors will own a combined 22 percent.

This Story

"We view this as a positive for both Clearwire and Sprint in the near term," said Stifel Nicolaus analyst Christopher King in a research note. Sprint and Clearwire were able to realize their dreamed future network through the funding of outsiders who have their own interests in wireless broadband, he said.

The network will create another option for consumers as wireless leaders AT&T and Verizon Wireless, who are on a similar timetable to Sprint, deploy their next generation of faster wireless services, according to analysts. Key lawmakers have criticized a recent auction of radio spectrum that was won mostly by AT&T and Verizon Wireless, which they said effectively broadened the gap between the two leaders and smaller carriers.

"That gets to the heart of public policy issues facing the industry right now in Washington . . . getting a truly legitimate third pipe into the home," Wolff said in an interview.

The high-speed, wireless data service is expected to augment bundled packages of such services by cable providers Comcast, Time Warner and Bright House, which have all invested in the venture. Cable companies have pushed into phone services, capturing 15 million phone users in the nation as they compete with telecommunication companies AT&T and Verizon Communications. The telecom giants are in turn offering paid television services, which compete with cable's cash cow television services.

The plan was attractive to Silicon Valley titans Google and Intel, both companies trying to stake a claim in broadband wireless markets. Intel agreed to put $1 billion into the deal because it wants its chips in every laptop connected to the network. For Google, its $500 million investment was relatively cheap in its latest move to ensure it will sell ads over mobile devices that carry its maps, search and e-mail applications, analyst said.

Still there are concerns about the technology, which hasn't been proved on a wide scale. Sprint has launched testing of its WiMax service in the Washington and Baltimore areas, the company said. It didn't elaborate on the results.

"There are questions about this spectrum, including how well it penetrates walls and windows," said Craig Moffett, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein. "But this venture is terrifying for Verizon and AT&T, which are now starting to think about how to make money from the billions of dollars they spent recently on new spectrum."

The first- and second-largest carriers, AT&T and Verizon Wireless, plan to use a rival technology called Long Term Evolution, or LTE, to build networks with comparable speed and reach of WiMax.

Sprint has a large amount of airwaves to put toward WiMax, but signals carried on those airwaves do not travel as far as they do on airwaves used by competitors, said Michael Thelander of the Signals Research Group.

The spectrum recently won by AT&T and Verizon in an FCC auction can travel farther and penetrate walls more easily, he said. That means the carriers will likely be able to build out far-reaching networks with fewer towers to carry the signals. Sprint's high-capacity WiMax network will likely need more cell towers built closer together to ensure consumers' signals don't fade out as they travel between towers on a highway, for example, Thelander said.

"It's like having an eight-lane highway versus a two-lane highway," he said. "But it's more expensive to build an eight-lane highway."

Sprint and Clearwire will also likely need to add capacity to transmit data between towers and the network core. That is often costly as it involves laying more fiber-optic cables or using high-powered microwave signals.

"As networks grow, you have to push the capacity of those pipes. That's become very expensive to do," said Danny Locklear, a director at Nortel Networks, which has helped develop WiMax networks in countries such as the Dominican Republic and in Eastern Europe.


<       2


» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company