Washington Hospital Center has a plan to handle a medical catastrophe -- but not the federal funds it needs.
Friday, May 9, 2008; A26
AREPORT from Congress warns that the Washington area is ill-prepared to deal with the medical consequences of a catastrophic event. What's scary -- and maddening -- about this grim reminder of the region's vulnerability is that one possible solution is at hand but has languished because of government inaction. Instead of just sounding the alarm, Congress needs to find the money for a project that would go a long way toward improving disaster preparedness for the high-risk Washington region.
The ER One project of the Washington Hospital Center directly addresses the concerns raised by a recent report from House Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Committee members surveyed trauma centers in the country's top cities and found them all lacking the capability to deal with the aftermath of "predictable surprises" such as terrorist attacks. The District was found to be woefully lacking in capacity. Indeed, Washington Hospital Center, the region's biggest provider of acute care, was the single most crowded facility of the 34 hospitals surveyed.
Officials at Washington Hospital Center were not surprised by the findings. For almost a decade they have been aware of the issues and have been developing better ways to deal with the mass casualties that would result from natural disasters or epidemics. The awful reality of Sept. 11, 2001, and the subsequent anthrax attacks made the officials' work in designing a new type of emergency-care facility all the more relevant -- and urgent. The beauty of ER One is that it could deal with casualties resulting from an event such as a biological attack or a natural pandemic but would also provide day-to-day care.
Some progress -- what hospital officials call baby steps -- has occurred over the past seven years in the effort to bring the project to life. The Bush administration supported its planning and design with federal funds, and just last month the hospital unveiled the use of innovative technologies it had developed for ER One. But an estimated $100 million to $125 million is needed for construction. The hospital is prepared to pay about $25 million and hopes the bulk of the rest will be federal money. Washington is home to the federal government, and so the importance of this facility -- and the appropriateness of federal funding -- is evident. Then, too, the project is being developed as a national pilot with plans to share innovations and ideas with other health-care facilities.
Since the Bush administration has supported this public-private partnership, it was troubling that this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt told D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) that he had heard of ER One but knew nothing more of it. In its remaining months, this administration could boost a project that would help make the nation's capital and its environs safer for those who live, work and govern here.
Post a Comment
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.