A Vital Disaster Program
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
We disagree with Ruth Marcus's attack [op-ed, April 30] on a vital program we developed in the farm bill to aid farmers and ranchers devastated by weather-related disasters.
When disaster strikes, we all suffer. Agricultural disasters result in lost crops, livestock and livelihoods. When production is lost, food prices rise. And if disaster aid is uncertain, banks hesitate to lend farmers money to replant.
Instead of forcing family farmers to go hat in hand to the government each time disaster strikes, this farm bill provides a responsible safety net. As opposed to previous ad hoc disaster programs, this standing disaster program is budgeted for and is paid for, resulting in real reform. Further, in this new program, only those with whole-farm losses are eligible for assistance. Again, real reform.
This disaster program is not limited to farmers on the Northern Great Plains, as Ms. Marcus suggested. Natural disasters can strike anytime and anyplace. In the past three years, every state has received a federal disaster payment. Last year alone, federal disaster areas were declared in 45 states, and in every county in Alabama, Delaware and Georgia, areas far from the Northern Great Plains.
This farm bill includes substantial reform. It deserves the support of the entire Congress and certainly the support of the president.
U.S. Senator (D-N.D.)
Chairman, Senate Budget Committee
MAX BAUCUS


Discussion Policy