Belt-Tightening in Montgomery County
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The May 7 editorial "Soap, Toilet Paper and Sacrifice" criticized the public-sector employees union's cost-cutting suggestions for Montgomery County. When we submitted a lengthy inventory of savings opportunities to the County Council last month, we emphasized the toilet paper angle because, otherwise, the media probably would have ignored our suggestions.
The context of our recommendations to the county's elected officials -- which we hoped the media would also report -- was the serious suggestion that as major stakeholders in budget decisions, county workers are willing to cooperate and collaborate in identifying potential solutions. Moreover, county workers are intimately familiar with the wasteful spending that depletes the county's coffers.
The suggestion that county workers should volunteer to pare down contractually established pay increases not only ignores the financial realities of living and working in one of most expensive areas in the country, it also undermines the collective bargaining process.
GINO RENNE
President
Municipal and County Government
Employees Organization (United Food and
Commercial Workers Local 1994)


Discussion Policy