Business Proposals Win Board Approval

Revenue Anticipated By Supervisors

Discussion Policy

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

By Kristen Mack

Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, May 11, 2008; Page LZ05

Two commercial developments, one near a Civil War battlefield and another in the residentially dense western end of the county, were approved by supervisors last week to bring economic development to Prince William.

"The tax pie is going to grow on the commercial side because of projects like this," Supervisor W.S. Covington III (R-Brentsville) said of the developments, which are in his district.

"That's been a weakness in Prince William for a while. What we added [Tuesday] night was significant commercial tax revenue," he said. "We need to do more of that. It's critical for us to grow more."

Manassas Business Park will be a commercial development near Bristoe Station Battlefield Heritage Park. The site also is close to Manassas Regional Airport and the Broad Run/Airport station of Virginia Railway Express.

The county planning commission recommended denial of the project, but after developers agreed to donate more land for preservation and pay for traffic improvements, the planning staff supported it.

Developers reduced the density from more than 1 million square feet to 570,000.

But historic preservation groups and Civil War buffs have called the land the second-most-hallowed ground in Prince William. They expressed concerns that development would disrupt sight lines to Bristoe Station Battlefield and increase traffic.

One of the weaknesses of the application, according to county staff, had been the lack of a detailed site layout and building elevations.

Covington said he was glad that the project was rejected by the planning commission because it forced developers to revamp their proposal.

"It gave me leverage," he said. "I wasn't willing to give up. . . . If you walk away from it, you're encouraging housing."

The plan was approved by the Board of County Supervisors, 7 to 1, with Supervisor Martin E. Nohe (R-Coles) voting against it.

The other development, known as Bristow Commons, was unanimously approved by the supervisors, despite recommended denial from the planning commission and county staff.

CONTINUED 1 >