A Watershed Moment for the Crab

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Friday, May 16, 2008; Page A18

To be truly serious about saving the crab, we should stop thinking about crabs and the people whose livelihood depends on them ["Saving the Crab -- and the Watermen," Close to Home, May 11]. This may sound callous, but I'm serious, for reasons that include a personal history of pulling crab pots and trotlines, tonging for oysters and dragging in seines and gill nets.

As a community and region, we will do far more to do justice to both crabs and watermen through total watershed strategies. Perseverance in counting crabs, dividing the catch, and re-creating bi-state advisory bodies that have diligently observed the present decline do little to foster much hope.

That our human-centric affections would leave us concerned about declining prospects for watermen is understandable. But this is thinking tactically when we need a broad strategy. If we focus primarily on the human economy or one species alone we will surely do more harm than good.

GEOFFREY PARKER

Dunkirk, Md.


© 2008 The Washington Post Company