| Page 2 of 2 < |
Architect Requests More Changes to King Statue
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The letter set off intense debate, with members of the public and the arts community arguing the pros and cons of the sculpture. "I had to rush around and mend fences that weren't even broken," Jackson, the head architect, said.
On Wednesday he met with commission Chairman Earl A. Powell III, at the National Gallery of Art, which Powell directs.
"This is all part of the process," Jackson said, adding that he talked to Powell about the criticisms and modifications being made to the model. "I think we are singing from the same songbook."
"I would characterize it more as a progress report," Powell said. "At the last meeting we saw clay models. We had some concerns about the evolution of the image. At some point we'll see some refinements of that. The direction it's headed in is what we're concerned about.
"We want to be helpful in the discourse and get one of the great monuments for Washington out of this," he added.
By law, no project like the memorial can go forward without approval from the commission, the federal agency that advises the government on public design and aesthetics in the capital.
Most memorials and monuments proposed for Washington undergo rigorous review and public debate, which can go on for years and involve significant design changes. The Korean War Veterans Memorial, for example, had more than a dozen statues subtracted from its design.
Jackson said several adjustments in the King model had been made before the commission voiced its objections.
He said, for example, that the furrows between King's eyebrows already had been removed, at his request. He showed a photograph of the model he received from Lei early last week in which that seems evident.
In addition, the pen King is holding had to be replaced because of a research error.
The pen appeared to be in King's left hand in a copy of the 1966 Bob Fitch photo the foundation acquired, Jackson said. But after the sculptor finished the first models, the foundation discovered it had accidentally been sent a reversed copy of the photo. King was right-handed, and the pen was in his right hand. According to Jackson, the project officials realized: "If we put a pen in his left hand, it suggests he's left-handed. We can't do that."
In response to the commission, Jackson said he is now asking if Lei can alter the model to make King's figure appear more integrated into the stone, "as if he still hasn't cleared the stone."
The sculpture controversy is the latest to hit the project. Last year, critics complained after Lei was introduced as the chief sculptor, saying an African American artist, or any American, would have been preferable, and contending that the models did not look like King.
The King memorial has been authorized by Congress. A groundbreaking ceremony was held in 2006. And preliminary utility work on the site is expected to begin this month, Jackson said.
Major work, or "the big dig," as he called it, is expected to start by October, and the memorial could be completed next year.
Jackson said an inspirational image is still a goal of the project. "We want something that when you experience it, you're moved by it," he said.
Researcher Wu Meng in Shanghai contributed to this report.










