GENERAL ASSEMBLY
O'Malley Won't Sign Malt Drink Measure

Buy Photo
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley said yesterday that he will allow a bill to take effect without his signature that classifies flavored malt beverages as beer, resisting late-hour calls for a veto from public health advocates and groups fighting drunken driving.
In a letter to legislative leaders, O'Malley (D) acknowledged that the decision was difficult, saying the absence of his signature signals that the General Assembly should revisit the issue of alcohol regulation in its next session and that he is committed to "a much-needed forward-looking agenda to attack the issue of underage drinking."
The classification of the increasingly popular drinks, dubbed "alcopops" by some, affects the rate at which they are taxed and whether their sale is restricted to liquor stores. Beer is available more broadly in most Maryland counties.
The bill, which passed by large margins in the House of Delegates and Senate, was spurred by an opinion in March by Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler (D) that the beverages should be treated as distilled spirits, an interpretation at odds with current practice in Maryland. Supporters of the legislation said they were merely attempting to preserve the status quo.
Charles Hurley, chief executive of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, said last night that he was "very disappointed" in O'Malley. "I would have more respect for the governor if he had signed the bill and accepted responsibility," Hurley said.
O'Malley said he will seek to work with the General Assembly with an eye toward creating a new category of regulation for flavored malt beverages.
"I look forward . . . to working with advocates on both sides to build a broader consensus for regulating these alcoholic beverages," O'Malley said in a statement.
The announcement came on the eve of O'Malley's final scheduled bill-signing ceremony after the 90-day session that ended last month. According to a list released last night, O'Malley will sign almost 150 bills today, including a controversial measure that would allow for-profit entities to provide debt-management counseling.
Other bills scheduled to be signed today would expand senior prescription drug assistance and create an authority to oversee the sale of the financially ailing Prince George's County hospital system.
O'Malley also announced late yesterday his only veto this year of a bill passed by the Democratic-controlled legislature. The bill would have required the state to reimburse Anne Arundel County for costs associated with testing and monitoring well water. O'Malley let become law without his signature a separate bill that allows Anne Arundel to set higher permit fees for drilling a well than is allowed under state law.
O'Malley had been heavily lobbied in recent weeks by supporters and opponents of the flavored malt beverages bill.
He was scheduled to sign the bill April 24 but pulled it from the list that morning after a meeting with opponents, including Hurley. O'Malley said at the time that he wanted "a little more time to think about it."




