Kenneth Harney
The Nation's Housing

Looser Credit on the Way In 'Declining' Markets?

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Kenneth R. Harney
Saturday, May 24, 2008

Could the mortgage industry scrap its controversial practice of listing hundreds of local real estate markets as "declining" -- and restricting lending there through higher down payments or credit scores?

The two biggest players in the home mortgage field, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, did precisely that last week. Reversing its policy of penalizing buyers in troubled real estate markets with five-percentage-point higher down payments, Fannie Mae switched to a policy of requiring the same minimum down payments irrespective of location. Freddie Mac spokesman Brad German said his company will be "suspending" its declining-markets policy indefinitely, too.

Starting June 1, mortgage applicants who are underwritten by Fannie Mae's automated system online will qualify for a 3 percent minimum down payment, wherever the property is. Borrowers whose applications require "manual" underwriting will have a 5 percent minimum.

Under Fannie Mae's previous system, applicants buying houses in designated declining markets had to contribute five percentage points extra in upfront equity compared with borrowers in nondeclining areas.

Freddie Mac did not use a list of specific areas designated as declining; it relied instead on lenders to flag applications using appraisal data or home-price indexes. For those applicants, it also required the same increase in equity contributions upfront.

Critics, including the National Association of Realtors and consumer advocacy groups, had charged that Fannie Mae's policy served to further depress sales and real estate values in areas tainted as declining.

Critics also argued that many metropolitan markets experiencing price decreases contain submarkets performing relatively well and do not deserve to be underwritten as high risk.

Marianne Sullivan, Fannie Mae's senior vice president for single-family credit and risk management, said the policy reversal was possible because of improvements to the company's automated underwriting system allowing it to "assess each loan more precisely" wherever the property is.

The change was welcomed by national real estate and housing groups. Dick Gaylord, president of the National Association of Realtors, said the termination of a policy that "stigmatized" certain communities will "help stabilize the credit markets."

David Berenbaum, executive vice president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said his group hopes the revised policies will be "a model for others to follow."

Whether that happens anytime soon is far from certain. Almost all private mortgage insurers, which provide loss protection to lenders on loans with low down payments, have adopted highly restrictive policies affecting Zip codes or metropolitan areas they designate as distressed or declining.

MGIC, the largest-volume mortgage insurer, recently expanded its list of distressed markets along with a series of cutbacks on specific types of low-equity loans. As of June 1, MGIC will not insure mortgages on condominium units in Florida. It has also abandoned cash-out refinancings and loans on investment properties.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company