A New Way to Tackle Foreclosures

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Jack Guttentag
Saturday, May 31, 2008; Page F04

Over the past several weeks, I have discussed a proposal for a new type of mortgage insurance called mortgage payment insurance. Under MPI, insurers would guarantee investors' timely receipt of mortgage payments after the borrower defaults, as well as protect against loss if the loan goes to foreclosure.

Even though the insurer assumes almost the entire risk of default, because MPI would reduce the interest rate on high-risk loans, such loans would cost the insurer less than traditional mortgage insurance.

Because no insurers offer MPI, at this point it is just a proposal. The idea came from a friend of mine, lawyer Igor Roitburg, who has a patent pending. I have an interest in that patent.

I think that if MPI were available, it could be used immediately to reduce the number of foreclosures and to reduce losses on the foreclosures that do occur. Here's how it could work for loans in default:

· Loans in default that carry traditional mortgage insurance. We estimate that there are 600,000 loans in default that have traditional mortgage insurance. Case-by-case efforts to modify these loans will make only a tiny dent. There are major impediments to such modifications, and even when these obstacles are removed, the process is costly and time-consuming. MPI makes possible wholesale modifications, covering large numbers of loans, that are in the interest of all parties -- borrowers, insurers, investors and servicers.

If loans in default carry traditional mortgage insurance, the insurer is already on the hook for the coming loss, up to the cap on the policy. If the proceeds from selling the property do not cover the unpaid balance, including accrued interest plus foreclosure expenses, the investor is protected for any deficiency, up to the cap.

In more normal conditions, deficiencies in coverage seldom arise. In the current market, however, depreciation in house prices has made deficiencies the rule rather than the exception.

Under these circumstances, there's a way to use MPI to help both the insurer and the investor, and save a significant number of borrowers from foreclosure.

The way to do that would be to convert existing mortgage insurance policies to MPI at the prime interest rate, provided that the monthly mortgage payment would drop by 10 percent or more.

The major benefit would arise when the resulting payment reduction allows the borrower to return to good standing. All three parties would be better off. The downside to the investor would be that some of these loans might cure themselves without having to reduce the rate. Losses to the investor from this, however, would be much smaller than the gains from loans that return to good standing and would not have cured themselves.

Loan servicers should have an interest in making such deals because the resumption of payments also would mean a resumption of servicing fees. When borrowers stop paying, servicing fees stop. As loans are placed in good standing under MPI, servicing fees would resume.

· Loans in default that do not have traditional mortgage insurance. When loans in default do not carry insurance, the investors are on the hook for the entire loss.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2009 The Washington Post Company