Experts: Surgery Painstaking, Delicate

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 2, 2008; 2:26 PM

The brain surgery that Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) underwent is an extremely delicate, painstaking procedure but offers him the best hope of extending his survival, several neurosurgeons not involved in his care said today.

"The treatment that has been shown to make the most difference as far as survival is removal of the tumor," said Vivek Deshmukh, director of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery at George Washington University Medical Center. "Surgical removal carries the greatest benefit in terms of extending his survival."

Even if the surgery and follow-up radiation and chemotherapy go well, however, Kennedy's prognosis remains fairly grim. Most patients survive only about a year, although with surgery, survival can be extended by two or three years and in rare cases even longer.

"It's the only hope you can give for prolonged survival. It's giving the patient and the family hope for greater length of survival you wouldn't otherwise have," Deshmukh said.

To prepare for the surgery, Kennedy would have undergone an MRI brain scan last night to provide neurosurgeon Allan H. Friedman at Duke University Medical Center with a detailed image of the size and location of the tumor, which is in a part of his brain called the left parietal lobe.

This part of the brain is involved in certain aspects of speech, sensation and motor control on the right side of the body, so the decision to operate apparently means surgeons determined they had a good chance of removing a large part of the tumor without causing devastating damage.

"If the tumor is located in a speech or motor area, then surgery is usually not performed," Deshmukh said. "In this case they have made the determination the benefits of the surgery outweigh the risk."

After Kennedy had been anesthetized and a small part of his head shaved, Friedman would made an incision probably about four to six inches long to pull back the scalp and expose the bone, experts familiar with the procedure said. The surgeon would then use a drill to cut a roughly dime-sized hole in the skull in order to insert a second drill bit, shaped like a hockey stick, to cut out a larger piece of bone, probably about three inches in diameter. Friedman would then use a scalpel to cut through the layer of tissue covering the brain, known as the dura.

Before beginning the actual brain surgery--and sometimes during it--the patient would be made conscious so doctors can ask the patient questions to ensure they are not damaging parts of the brain responsible for language.

Friedman would use a high-powered microscope to begin painstakingly cutting into the brain to locate the cancer and remove as much of the tumor tissue as possible, usually using a computer-guided system to help him navigate.

"The computer can tell use precisely where we are on his brain and which direction we need to go to go to his tumor," Deshmukh said.

The cancerous tissue can be excised with several devices, including a tiny scissors-like scalpel and instruments that use heat or high-frequency sound waves to dissolve the tissue and suction it out.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2008 The Washington Post Company