Bush Wants Sun to Set on Midnight Regulations

|
Discussion Policy Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. |
The Bush administration promises that as it leaves office in January, federal agencies won't make the usual last-minute rush to paper Washington with new regulations.
White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten issued a May 9 memo outlining a disciplined exit to replace what could be called midnight madness. Except in extraordinary circumstances, regulations that agencies plan to put out should be proposed by June 1 and final rules issued by Nov. 1, he said.
Bolten wrote that the administration needed to continue a "principled approach to regulation as we sprint to the finish, and resist the historical tendencies of administrations to increase regulatory activities in their final months."
Critics of the administration interpret the directive as a move to shut down the regulatory apparatus early. Bush officials say it's merely an effort to ensure agencies have time to review rules and give the public a chance to comment.
If the order is followed, it would be the first time since 1948 that there wouldn't be a significant jump in output in the days before the regulatory coach turns into a pumpkin, according to a study of the phenomenon.
No matter who controls the White House, when power shifts to the other party, the page count in the Federal Register -- where new regulations are published -- in the period between an election and inauguration is, on average, 17 percent higher than in non-election years, according to a study titled "Midnight Regulations" by the Mercatus Center, a nonprofit economic research group at George Mason University.
Perhaps the best-known example was the Clinton administration issuing a controversial rule in November 2000 designed to prevent ergonomic, or repetitive stress, injuries on the job. The proposal had taken almost a decade of work, in part because of delays imposed by a Republican-controlled Congress.
It was part of 26,542 pages of rules that federal agencies published in the last three months of Clinton's tenure -- a 51 percent increase over the same period in the previous three years, according to the Mercatus study.
On Jan. 20, 2001, the new Bush White House told agencies to postpone any Clinton-era rules not yet in effect and to suspend work on those not yet published. In one of his first acts, Bush signed a law that scrapped the Clinton repetitive-motion rule. Clinton also had blocked completed rules that weren't yet public.
"The public is ill-served," Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, said of the Bolten memo. "It wants government to be its protector. This memo says 'We are done November 1.' " Bass's nonprofit organization monitors the Office of Management and Budget and federal rulemaking.
Conservatives said the Bolton memo merely moves up the date for getting often-controversial rules out the door.
"There are things they want to achieve, and this memo doesn't change that," said Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at Mercatus who recently updated the study.


Discussion Policy